Matthew on Money — Text and Context
Edition facts
This digital edition of Matthew on Money — Text and Context is described by source-level measurements including 6,938 words, 31 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 20.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Money -- Religious aspects -- Christianity,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
o one was permitted to burden himself with two coats and thus belie his message and his Master. Their moral earnestness was to be maintained under all circumstances and in case any refused to receive them or hear their words they were to shake off the dust of their feet for a testimony against them.
“If God’s truth is to succeed,” says Dr. Gregg, “it must incarnate itself: if God’s cause is to win a victory it must embody itself in a person.” Men must be the truth in order to preach the truth in its purity and power. Ministers must be sent by Christ, receive authority from him, follow his program, outclass money and take rank among men as his representatives.
Peter’s mistake with reference to payment of the temple tax which is recorded in the seventeenth of Matthew was not the only mistake Peter made. There were others and all were corrected, the correction in this case being memorable if not also unforgettable.
Peter promised payment without consulting Jesus. He thought he knew what Jesus would do in the case and to confess ignorance would lower him in the estimation of those who received the tax. But Peter had failed to consider the fact that as the Son in the house of his Father Jesus was free. Jesus points out Peter’s error as a friend who will not allow his mistake to be incorporated in his thought and life only to vitiate both.
Jesus takes account also of those who received the tax for they were not prepared to receive his explanation. His miraculous power is called into service to relieve the situation. And why not? Is not his Sonship called in question? He directs Peter where and how to get the required shekel. For a little while Peter returns to his former occupation but his skill as a fisherman is supplemented by the superior knowledge and power of Christ and so when he makes payment it is “for me and thee” because Peter’s position is not the same as that of the Master.
Our Lord is careful where men are inclined to be careless. Trifles may make the sum of life but life is no trifle. “You may be too superb to pay attention to the small debt due your neighbor,” says Dr. Deems, “but God is so great that he can pay attention to the least of things.” Matthew’s four verses concerning a matter of thirty-three cents have their place and their use in scripture. We soon lose sight of the half shekel and center our thoughts upon Christ, who corrects Peter so faithfully, who respects the feelings of those who receive the tax and who even takes account of us at this distance by giving us this minute view of himself. Little things like this reveal the greatness of our Lord and just such touches confirm Prof. Stalker’s statement that “the pagan world not only never produced one holy man but never drew the picture of one.”
In the nineteenth chapter we find these words from the lips of Jesus: “It is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. It is easier for a camel to go through a needle’s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” He is stating a thing that is impossible and the disciples ask in amazement, “Who then can be saved?” Their question calls forth His answer, “With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.” Men can be reconstituted but this requires divine assistance. As Canon Westcot has said, “Jesus established fresh foundations for society and a fresh standard of individual worth.”
Is it still hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven? As hard as ever and absolutely impossible as long as he makes riches his object in life, as long as he compromises with evil for a consideration, as long as he ruins competitors in business in order to create a monopoly. But does the Church know what Jesus meant to teach? Yes, if it knows itself and its duty, which is “to show to the world its chief concern is morality, not money; principles, not profits; the faith of the crucified Christ, not the favors of men who have accumulated fortunes without righteousness.”
Lawrence Keister opens his study by asserting that Matthew's former occupation as a tax collector left a discernible mark on his gospel: 'He always speaks of money with the accuracy and discrimination of a man who is accustomed to its possession and use.' This editorial note traces how Keister builds his argument through close reading of Matthew's financial vocabulary, contrasting ideal givers with would-be givers and betrayers. The excerpts reveal a methodical structure that pairs episodes—the Wise Men's gifts against Satan's offer, Mary's anointing against Judas's bargain—to expose motives behind every transaction.
The Tax Collector's Vocabulary
Keister repeatedly calls attention to Matthew's precise financial diction. He notes that Matthew alone records the Wise Men's gifts of 'gold and frankincense and myrrh,' specifying each item rather than using a general term. The author argues this reflects Matthew's habit of 'accuracy and discrimination' with money. Similarly, in the temptation narrative, Keister highlights that Matthew frames Satan's offer as a 'gift' that would subordinate Christ, using commercial language to expose the transaction's spiritual cost. The author's own prose mirrors this precision: he describes Judas's deal with the chief priests as a 'bargain' where 'the purchase price is paid and accepted and the transaction is complete.' These word choices are not incidental but central to Keister's thesis that Matthew's financial background informs his theological perspective.
Contrasting Givers: Wise Men and Satan
Keister structures his argument around paired opposites. The Wise Men 'give while they are in his presence and while they are in the spirit of worship,' their offering 'a part of their confession of faith.' In contrast, Satan proposes to give 'as a last resort and after other means had failed,' his gift intended 'to tempt him to betray His trust.' Keister emphasizes that Satan 'remains Satan in the presence of Christ, unchanged and unchangeable,' unable to follow the Wise Men's order of worship-then-gift. This juxtaposition is not merely illustrative; Keister uses it to establish a moral taxonomy of giving. The Wise Men's open-handed worship is set against Satan's conditional offer, which requires Christ to 'fall down and worship him' in return. The author thus reads Matthew's narrative as a series of financial encounters that reveal character.
Devotion and Defection: Mary and Judas
Keister observes that Matthew places Mary's anointing immediately before Judas's betrayal, calling this arrangement 'logical in its course and outcome.' The woman's act of devotion—using precious ointment to anoint Jesus for burial—is contrasted with Judas's question to the chief priests: 'What are ye willing to give me, and I will deliver him unto you?' Keister notes that 'the devotion that anointed Jesus for his burial may have incited Judas to betray him,' suggesting a causal link between the two events. He further argues that Judas 'assumed the right to sell Jesus as Satan assumed the right to bestow the world as a gift,' drawing a parallel between the two betrayers. The author concludes that 'men cannot remain indifferent to Christ' and that the choice lies 'between sale and service, the defection of Judas and the devotion of Mary.'
The Orderly Procession of Thought
In his recapitulation, Keister describes Matthew's money references as 'parts of the truth, which fit together in an “orderly procession of thought.”' He summarizes the gospel's financial themes: the Wise Men give in recognition of Christ as King; Satan proposes to dethrone him; Christ teaches that motives count in almsgiving; Peter's tax mistake stems from inadequate knowledge; riches obstruct the unsaved but not the saved. Keister's own structure mirrors this procession, moving from specific episodes to general principles. He emphasizes that 'a right idea of God and a right relation to God prepare men for a right use of money,' tying the entire study back to Matthew's vocational lens. The author does not claim to exhaust the topic but rather to demonstrate how Matthew's financial background provides a coherent interpretive key.
Keister's study is best approached as a series of linked meditations rather than a systematic theology of wealth. Readers familiar with the Gospel of Matthew will recognize the episodes he selects, but his focus remains on the evangelist's distinctive voice rather than on harmonizing with other gospels. The brevity of the work—under 7,000 words—allows for concentrated attention on Keister's central claim: that Matthew's financial vocabulary is not incidental but integral to his portrayal of Christ's kingdom.
This book made me think of my grandfather, who counted coins in a ledger each Sunday, muttering about exactness. His quiet precision mirrored Matthew’s tax-collector’s eye. Later, The Kingdom of Promise and Prophecy — Story, Setting & Ideas gave me that same hush—a sense of sacred arithmetic, where every soul’s value is weighed tenderly, like a prayer for the frail.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.