St. Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians: A Practical Exposition — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
St. Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians: A Practical Exposition — Context and Discussion can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 65,088 words, 4 hr 43 min estimated reading time, and 10 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 21.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Bible. Ephesians -- Commentaries,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Israel had had for its main motive the hope of the Christ. All that St. Paul now believed was that this hope had been realized, and realized to the shame of Israel in One whom they had rejected {8} and crucified. But if to believe that Jesus was the Christ involved no breach with the religion of Israel, yet it did involve the recognition that it had been reconstituted on a new basis, and in a way that suggested to existing Israelites nothing less than a revolution. The church of God had, in St. Paul's present belief, widened out from being the church of one nation into being a catholic society, a society for all mankind.
If St. Paul's epistles are taken in those groups into which they naturally divide themselves, we find that in the first group, that of the two epistles to the Thessalonians, all his favourite topics are present as it were in the germ, but nothing that is specially characteristic of him is yet developed. The free admission of the Gentiles into the Church is, with the accompanying hostility of the Jews, assumed[4], but not much insisted upon; but in the interval between these epistles and that to the Galatians the subject had gained fresh and poignant interest. A party of Christians having their centre at Jerusalem had been trying--in spite of the decision of the apostolic council at Jerusalem--to reimpose upon the consciences of {9} Gentile Christians, and with especial success in the Galatian province, the obligation of circumcision; or in other words had been trying to make it evident that the Church of God was as much as ever the people of the Jews, and that Gentiles could only become Christians by becoming also Jewish proselytes pledged to keep the law of Moses. In view of this attempt St. Paul re-embarks upon his great campaign for the catholicity of the Church, and in his epistles of the second group[5] (especially those to the Galatians and the Romans) the catholicity of Christianity is vindicated controversially upon the basis of the principle of _justification by faith, not by works of the law_.
The meaning and real importance of this doctrine ought not to be hard for us to understand. To be justified means to be accepted or acquitted by God. The Judaizers--that is the Christian representatives of the narrower religious spirit of Israel--held that, as God's covenant was with the Jews only, so men could obtain acceptance simply by the observance of that Mosaic law which was to the Jew at once the expression of the divine selection of his race, and the grounds of his arrogant {10} contempt for all who had not 'Abraham to their father[6].' But St. Paul had made trial of that theory, and had found it wanting. The observance of the law and the glorying in Jewish privileges had brought him no peace with God: had in fact served only to produce and deepen a sense of inner alienation from God and conviction of sin. Thus in acknowledging the messiahship of that Jesus whom the chosen people had rejected and surrendered to be crucified, he was abandoning utterly and for ever the standing-ground of Jewish pride: he was acknowledging that the only divine function of the law was to convince men of sin, and of their need of pardon and salvation: he was taking his stand as a sinner among the Gentiles, and humbly welcoming the unmerited boon of pardon and acceptance from the hand of the divine mercy in Christ Jesus. When St. Paul in familiar arguments, from the witness of the Old Testament itself, and from the moral experience of men, convicts the law of inadequacy as an instrument of justification, his reasoning is full of a strong feeling and conviction bred of his own experiences. The true means of justification, he has come to perceive, is faith, that is, {11} the simple acceptance of the divine favour freely offered, and this is something that belongs to no special race, but to all men as such. For all men everywhere, to whom the light comes, can know that they are sinners in the sight of God, and can accept simply from the hand of the divine bounty the unmerited boon of forgiveness and acceptance in Christ. Thus, if faith and faith alone is that whereby men are justified or commended to God, then at once the catholic basis of the reconstituted Church is secured. All men can belong to it who can feel their need and hear the Gospel and take God at His word. This is the great principle vindicated in the compressed and fiery arguments of the Epistle to the Galatians, and then subsequently developed in the calmer and orderly procedure of the Epistle to the Romans.
Charles Gore opens his exposition of Ephesians by addressing the ordinary Christian reader, not the critical scholar. He writes in the preface that his aim is to make the epistle 'as intelligible as may be' so that readers can 'read, mark, learn and inwardly digest' it. The method is consistent: each section of the biblical text is preceded by an analysis or paraphrase that covers every element of the teaching, then followed by explanations of particular phrases and practical reflections. Gore deliberately avoids discussing rival views, offering instead what he judges to be the best explanations. This approach makes the volume a companion for devotional study rather than a technical commentary.
Paraphrase as a Bridge to Understanding
Gore’s primary tool is the paraphrase. He does not simply reword the epistle; he expands it into connected prose that draws out logical connections and doctrinal implications. For example, in treating Ephesians 4, he writes a prolonged paraphrase that 'serves to bring out the innumerable points of interest in that rich passage' where Paul describes the unity of the Church. The paraphrase is not a substitute for the biblical text but a guide that shows how each clause builds toward Paul’s vision of the body of Christ. Gore then quotes the full passage (Ephesians 4:1–16) so the reader can compare his rendering with the original. This pattern—paraphrase, then quotation, then commentary—recurs throughout the book and gives the reader a structured way to engage with dense theological material.
Unity as the Central Theme
Gore repeatedly returns to the theme of church unity. In his discussion of Ephesians 4, he isolates several points for special attention. First, he notes that the Church is one because a common inward life—the Spirit from Christ—flows through it, making it one body. He quotes Chrysostom to reinforce this: 'As in a body it is spirit which holds all together, so it is in the Church.' Gore emphasizes that this inward life is imparted through outward means such as baptism and ministry, but the unity remains fundamentally spiritual. He also stresses that the completeness of the Church depends on the stability of individual members in the common faith, and that Christians must 'abide in the truth revealed to them in love' to grow into the completed life of Christ.
Practical Application for the Reader
Gore’s exposition is consistently practical. He does not stop at doctrinal explanation but draws out implications for the reader’s life and conduct. In the preface, he dedicates the book to the president of the Brotherhood of St. Andrew because that society represents 'a brave attempt to realize some of the chief practical lessons which this epistle is intended to enforce.' Throughout the commentary, Gore includes 'practical reflections' after each section. For instance, he warns against being 'children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine' and urges readers to resist the 'kingdom of deception' by holding fast to revealed truth. The tone is pastoral, not academic, and the language remains accessible even when discussing complex points like predestination or the divine secret.
The Structure of the Commentary
Gore organizes the book by following the epistle’s own divisions. The table of contents shows a clear outline: an introduction covering the study of the New Testament, the gospel of the Catholic Church, the Roman Empire, Ephesus, and the letter’s authorship; then the commentary proper, beginning with the salutation (1:1–2) and moving through the major sections. Each subsection has a heading that identifies the biblical passage and a thematic title, such as 'St. Paul’s leading thoughts: life in Christ' or 'Sin and redemption.' This structure allows the reader to locate specific passages easily and to see how Gore’s exposition fits within the larger argument of the epistle. The book also includes appendix notes, such as the one referenced about the Brotherhood of St. Andrew, which provide additional context without interrupting the flow of the commentary.
Gore’s exposition is best read with a Bible open beside it. The paraphrases and explanations assume the reader is following along in the text of Ephesians. Because Gore avoids technical debates and focuses on practical application, the book works well for individual devotional reading or group study. Readers should note that Gore writes from an early twentieth-century Anglican perspective, and his references to the 'Catholic Church' reflect that tradition. The commentary does not cover every verse in equal depth, but it provides a coherent, accessible guide to the epistle’s major themes.
Years at this desk have taught me how Paul’s plea for unity in Ephesians echoes oddly in Luther’s stubborn wrestling with Genesis—both men reaching for a thread of grace in the tangle of human failing. That old, plainspoken comfort sits beside my worn copy now. Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1: Luther on the Creation — Inside the Classic holds the same patient, quarrelsome love for Scripture’s breathing words.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.