Christ the True Melchisedec Being the substance of a sermon, preached on Sunday evening, July 24th, 1813, at the Obelisk Chapel — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
Christ the True Melchisedec Being the substance of a sermon, preached on Sunday evening, July 24th, 1813, at the Obelisk Chapel — Context and Discussion can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 9,191 words, 40 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 28.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Sermons, English -- 19th century,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
decree went forth that all men should bow to him. This shews him to be the righteousness of his people, and that he fills Zion with it; and that one day he will appear as the judge of quick and dead, and act before assembled worlds, as a righteous Judge—_King of Righteousness_.
The next title is _King of Peace_—as the author, the preacher, and revealer of all Peace, external, internal, and eternal. This title some have conjectured belonged to some Canaanitish king who reigned in Salem, afterwards called Jerusalem.—But the Apostle tells the Hebrews to regard the meaning of the title, _King of Peace_—though the time of his actual reigning in Jerusalem was not come, nor will it till the latter day glory. At present he is King of Peace, in the Gospel, in the Conscience, and in Mount Zion.—_Without Father_.—The human nature he had assumed at that time, in which he appeared to Abraham, was without Father or Mother, without Descent; for as a Priest, the Apostle is proving the fact, that he had no predecessors or successors, so of course, unlike the tribe of Levi. As God, he was without Father; the divine nature was underived, not begotten. He is the Son of God, in his official capacity, but not in the divine essence. His human nature was without Father—“The Son of Man but no Man’s Son,” _Erskine_.—_Without Mother_. The body, the likeness, the form in which he appeared to Abraham, was without Mother, for it was many years afterwards he was born of the Virgin; and though she had the honour to bear him yet she was purely passive is the act of the formation of his nature. In these same senses he was _without Descent_—he had no predecessors or successors, as God, or as the High Priest of our Profession. Hence he is said to be the first and the last; if so, then there were none before him, and there can be none after him. The objection to this expression is, that it only refers to a want of the knowledge of his Genealogy; but though this might be the case of some persons, or of any, yet they certainly descended from some one. It might as well be argued that because I stand alone, and never heard of any one relation in the world, that I was without descent. But then the Apostle speaks in stronger terms still, and which can only be applied to Divinity itself—_having neither beginning of days_, _nor end of life_: this expression must refer to his Divine Nature. He is himself the beginning, in whom God made all things. In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth; that is, in Christ; he was in the beginning with God, one with him in the council and secret purposes of God; as well as the everlasting God; nor will he ever die as Man any more. As Priest he never did die at all; as God, in his Divine Nature, it is impossible. As the glorious Mediator, he ever lives, and all who are united to him live also.—
_But made like the Son of God_. This expression, _like_, seems dark to many at first sight, but when we look at the Subject altogether, it is very clear that none can be like God but God himself. None can be like such a Priest, after such an Order, but the High Priest, Jesus himself. The body he was to assume from the beginning, he frequently assumed a likeness of. Hence Nebuchadnezzar saw one like the Son of God in the Furnace. Now no christian can for a moment disbelieve that this was Christ; and that, long before his incarnation, the likeness that appeared was the likeness of his body, now glorified. This appeared to Joshua, to Moses, to Lot, to Abraham, Jacob, Ezekiel, and John.—These all saw the likeness of the body that is now in heaven. So that this Son of God appeared like the Son of God, after his glorification. He loved our nature so well that he anticipated the assumption of it; he rejoiced in the habitable parts of the earth, and _his delights were with the Sons of Men_. This the dear Redeemer shewed frequently, by his visits to our earth, in the likeness of that body which is now raised and glorified, and to which likeness the bodies of God’s elect are predestinated to be conformed.
John Church's 1813 sermon, preached at the Obelisk Chapel, opens with a striking claim: Melchisedec is not a Canaanite king but the eternal Son of God himself. Church immediately dismisses what he calls "the common idea" that Christ is a priest after a human order, insisting instead that when God "means to draw a similitude of himself he likens himself to himself." This bold typological reading drives the entire sermon, which moves from the Garden of Eden to the Epistle to the Hebrews to demonstrate that Melchisedec—king of righteousness and peace—is a pre-incarnate appearance of Christ. Church's method is to treat Old Testament figures, from Adam to Abraham, as foreshadowings of Christ's priestly work, culminating in his glorified intercession at the Father's right hand.
Love as the Fountain of Covenant
Church grounds his entire argument in the nature of God as love. He writes that "all spring from love, for God is love—he is love itself, the fountain of it." This is not a general sentiment but a precise theological claim: the covenant of redemption was made in eternity, with the Father proposing and the Son accepting the work of salvation. Church emphasizes that Christ's delight in humanity predates creation—"My delights were with the Sons of Men"—and that immediately after the Fall, "the very same day that Adam sinned, the dear Redeemer hastened to make known the Covenant of Redemption and Mercy." This sequence is crucial: the blessing is pronounced before the curse. Church traces this pattern through Abel's sacrifice, Noah's ark, and the rainbow, each a "sweet token" of Christ. The sermon thus presents salvation history as a continuous unfolding of divine love, not a reaction to human failure.
Typology and the Priesthood of Christ
Church's central exegetical move is to identify Melchisedec as the Son of God, not a mere type. He argues that the Apostle in Hebrews couples two texts—"Thou art my Son" and "Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec"—to prove that Melchisedec is eternal. Church insists that Christ's priesthood is "after his own Order," not after Aaron's or any human line. The Levitical priests were "mere men" who died; Christ is "the God-Man" who ever lives. Church draws a sharp contrast between the earthly priesthood and Christ's glorified state: "the Order of our Melchisedec is appearing in a glorified state, at the right-hand of the Majesty in heaven, representing and blessing his people." This heavenly priesthood, he argues, was revealed to Abraham when Melchisedec blessed him after battle—a faint shadow of Christ's post-resurrection intercession.
Tithing as a Response of Gratitude
Church interprets Abraham's tithe to Melchisedec not as a legal obligation but as a pattern of thankful worship. He writes that believers give tithes of all—"body, soul, and spirit, time and talents"—because they have received blessings through prayer and faith. The tithe is a return of glory to God, who "refreshes us with himself as the Bread of Life" and "fills us with the Wine of his love." Church extends this typologically to the second coming: the faithful will "cast our crowns at his dear feet" and sing "Worthy the Lamb that was slain." This section grounds the sermon's high Christology in practical piety, showing how the eternal priesthood elicits a response of total devotion. The act of tithing becomes a foretaste of eschatological worship, where Christ receives the tithe of all creation.
Church's sermon is a dense weave of exegesis, typology, and devotion. Readers will benefit from following his scriptural references closely, especially the interplay between Genesis 14 and Hebrews 7. The sermon assumes a Calvinist framework and a high view of scripture; those unfamiliar with covenant theology may find the argument challenging but rewarding. Church's voice is urgent and pastoral, aiming not merely to inform but to evoke wonder at Christ's eternal priesthood. The text rewards slow reading, as its claims build on a chain of typological connections that Church treats as self-evident.
That sermon’s weight—Christ as eternal priest, before any throne—stirred a memory of my father’s worn Bible, marginal notes in pencil. He never preached, only read, slowly. These words about Melchisedec felt like that quiet. Another evening, the Weymouth New Testament in Modern Speech, Luke — A Closer Reading brought the same stillness, as if familiar lines had finally opened their hands to me.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.