An analyticall exposition of both the Epistles of the Apostle Peter — Reading Companion
Edition facts
The catalog record for An analyticall exposition of both the Epistles of the Apostle Peter — Reading Companion provides practical reading context through 93,106 words, 6 hr 45 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Bible. Peter -- Commentaries -- Early works to 1800,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ifice, acceptable to God by Iesus Christ._
Verse 6. _Wherefore it is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chiefe corner stone, elect, precious, and he that beleeveth on him shall not be confounded._
Verse 7. _Vnto you therefore which believe he is precious, but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,_
Verse 8. _And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient, whereunto also they are appointed._
Verse 9. _But ye are a chosen generation, a royall Priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people, that ye should shew forth the praises of him, who hath called you out of darknesse into his marvellous light:_
Verse 10. _Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God; which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy._
THE same exhortation that the Apostle had before proposed, he doth here againe repeat and presse, and that not simply and barely, but by that principle and meanes, whereof there may and ought to be very good use made. For by occasion of those things, which he had lately spoken of the word of God, he stirres up all the faithfull to the right use of this word, by whose helpe they might persist and grow in that grace, wherein they stood. The occasion and connexion of this exhortation with the words going before is intimated in that phrase or particle, _Wherefore_. The exhortation it selfe is to a desire or love of the word of God, which he had before commended, verse 2. Which exhortation he doth so lay downe, that in the first place he shewes, that the vices which are contrary to this duty, must be laid aside, and taken heed of which are five: _malice_, _guile_, _hypocrisies_, _envies_, _evill-speakings_, verse 1. And in the second place he gives reasons agreeable thereunto, to stirre us up unto this duty, (to wit, a desire of the word.) The first reason is taken, from the use or effect of this word in respect of them, that it makes much for the edification of the faithfull: and this Use is allegorically set forth, verse 2. where the regenerate faithfull are compared to infants newly borne, and the word to sincere milke; and the edification which is made by the word, is compared to that action, which infants obtaine by the use of wholesome milke. The second reason is taken, by a continuation of the same allegory, from the object of the word, which he proposed to be tasted, and that is God himselfe and our Saviour Jesus Christ: whose perfection and fitnesse for edification is declared. Verse 3. where he is said to be _gracious_: and is confirmed also by the experience and testimony of all the faithfull, who are said to have tasted this graciousnesse, _ibid._ _if so be yee have tasted that the Lord is gracious_.
William Ames's An Analyticall Exposition of both the Epistles of the Apostle Peter (1641) proceeds verse by verse, each passage subjected to a rigid analytical method: the text is first parsed into its logical parts, then doctrines are extracted, and finally uses are applied. The work is structured not as a continuous commentary but as a series of discrete analytical units, each beginning with an “Analysis” that breaks down the apostle’s argument into its constituent propositions. This method reflects Ames’s commitment to Ramist logic, where the goal is to lay bare the underlying structure of the biblical text.
The Analytical Method and Its Effects
Ames’s exposition is governed by a consistent analytical procedure. For each verse or passage, he first provides an “Analysis” that diagrams the logical flow of Peter’s argument. For example, the opening of 1 Peter is parsed into a twofold scope: the grace that puts a man into the state of grace, and the grace that directs duties according to one’s condition. This division then governs the entire commentary, with the first part running from chapter 1 to chapter 2, verse 13. The method produces a highly schematic reading: doctrines are numbered sequentially (Doctrine 1, Doctrine 2, etc.), and each is followed by a “Reason” and then “Uses.” The effect is a text that feels more like a theological textbook than a flowing exposition, prioritizing clarity and logical order over rhetorical flourish.
Recurring Images of Flowing Grace
Ames repeatedly employs a hydraulic metaphor to describe the transmission of grace. In Doctrine 7, he writes that God is “the first and principall fountaine,” Christ is “the secondary fountaine,” the faithful are “vessels that draw and receive this grace,” and the word and sacraments are “as the channels.” This image recurs throughout the exposition, emphasizing a hierarchical, mediated flow of divine blessing. The metaphor is not merely decorative; it structures Ames’s understanding of how grace operates—from God through Christ to believers via ordained means. The same image appears in his discussion of faith as an “instrumentall cause,” where faith is the vessel that receives grace from the fountain of Christ.
Movement Between Text and Doctrine
The exposition moves constantly between the biblical text and doctrinal inference. Ames does not simply paraphrase Peter; he extracts general theological principles from each verse. For instance, from 1 Peter 5:10 he derives the doctrine that “God is the only author of grace and peace,” supporting it with cross-references to other passages. This movement is bidirectional: the text supplies the raw material for doctrine, and the doctrine then illuminates the text. The “Uses” sections then apply the doctrine to refute errors (e.g., Papist invocation of saints), instruct believers, or exhort to prayer. This three-step pattern—analysis, doctrine, use—creates a rhythm that propels the reader from exegesis to application.
The Role of Faith as Instrumental Cause
Ames devotes careful attention to the nature of faith, which he calls the “instrumentall cause of grace and peace.” In his treatment of 2 Peter 1:2, he distinguishes between bare knowledge (γνῶσις) and acknowledging (ἐπίγνωσις), arguing that the latter signifies an effectual knowledge identical to faith. Faith is not the source of grace but the instrument by which grace is received—a distinction Ames insists upon to preserve divine sovereignty. He compares Adam as the beginning of nature and corruption to Christ as the beginning of grace, drawing a parallel between the two headships. This doctrinal precision is typical of the work, which consistently seeks to define terms and delineate causes.
Readers approaching this exposition should expect a methodical, almost architectural treatment of Peter’s epistles. Ames’s analytical framework rewards those who follow his logical divisions, but it can feel repetitive when read straight through. The work is best used as a reference for specific passages, where its numbered doctrines and uses provide clear, digestible units of theological reflection. The recurring imagery of fountains and channels offers a memorable key to Ames’s understanding of grace, making the exposition more than a mere collection of proof texts.
There’s something steady about Ames tracing grace through its fountains and channels, like watching water find its way home. It reminded me of an old companion I once kept for the Synoptic Gospels—less a guide than a patient friend. The two sit differently on the shelf, yet both feel like quiet rooms where the light falls gently and stays. Sources of the Synoptic Gospels — Inside the Classic carries that same unhurried stillness, I think.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.